No Result
View All Result
GATETEVIEWS
  • Home
  • About
  • Politics
  • Human of Kigali
  • Society
  • Legal
  • International Law
  • Contact us
  • Home
  • About
  • Politics
  • Human of Kigali
  • Society
  • Legal
  • International Law
  • Contact us
No Result
View All Result
GATETEVIEWS
No Result
View All Result
Home Legal

Comparative Laws and jurisprudence on Defamation, Libel, Slander and Sedition

by Gatete Ruhumuliza Nyiringabo
November 13, 2017
in Legal, Politics, Society
1
Share on FacebookWhatsappShare on Twitter

Rwandan lawmakers are debating the fate of defamation laws as part of a review/update of the Rwandan Penal Code. I thought I would contribute to the conversation by looking at how other countries have dealt with the question.

Legal Analysis

Summary:

Insult on the person of the President of the Republic, public insult and defamation are considered in many countries as mere ‘délits de presse’; essentially civil matters that, while they carry a financial compensation, they are subjected to the media regulator for disciplinary action.

In Africa, the High Court of Kenya has just stricken down the crime of defamation, declaring [about the penal code] that ‘the prospect of criminal proceedings and a jail term of up to 2 years for defamation is unnecessary, excessive and unjustifiable in an open and democratic society, and […] creates a disproportionate limit on freedom of expression.’

In South Africa while defamation is gazetted as a crime, the constitutional jurisprudence has advanced towards decriminalizing. In either country there were no
special provisions protecting the head of state against defamation.

In Europe and America however, occasional convictions of journalists continue to take place in states typically considered strong defenders of media freedom and freedom of expression such as Denmark, Germany, Switzerland and Canada. Defamation laws in those countries are said to be contradictory with their declared democratic pillars of public scrutiny and accountability.

Available international jurisprudence and doctrine concur that such laws should not be and that Heads of States should be more, not less, tolerant of criticism than private persons.

To access the full paper, please click on this link: Difamation Comparative Laws

Share2SendTweet1ShareShare

Gatete Ruhumuliza Nyiringabo

Next Post
The Great Lakes Syndrome

The Great Lakes Syndrome

‘Ibizungerezi’: Rwanda Shouldn’t criminalize Adultery

'Ibizungerezi': Rwanda Shouldn't criminalize Adultery

Comments 1

  1. test says:
    5 years ago

    sorry for annoying you (we would like to make your site accessible to our employees and wanted to know if its secure enough)

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Popular Blogs

  • Staring is caring..

    Staring is caring..

    19 shares
    Share 8 Tweet 5
  • Michaela Wrong is Valerie Bemeriki with an English accent!

    105 shares
    Share 42 Tweet 26
  • Do not mislead! A rejoinder to Michela Wrong’s book.

    83 shares
    Share 33 Tweet 21
  • Happy Mothers’ Day for Mama wa mama wanjye…

    13 shares
    Share 5 Tweet 3
  • Why did Paul Kagame and Felix Tshisekedi fall out? How can we repair relations?

    200 shares
    Share 80 Tweet 50

Category

  • Human of Kigali
  • Legal
  • Politics
  • Society
  • Uncategorized

About me

Human Rights Lawyer, blogger,
Senior Advocacy Expert, Senior Researcher
Centre for Human Rights – Rwanda

  • About
  • Contact
  • Contact us
  • Home
  • Home 2
  • Home 3
  • Home 4
  • Home 5
  • International Law
  • Legal
  • Share Cooks Registration Form

© 2021, Gateteviews since 2015

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About
  • Politics
  • Human of Kigali
  • Society
  • Legal
  • International Law
  • Contact us

© 2021, Gateteviews since 2015